GP2025 | Day 2 Reflections: Scaling DRR Financing — or Just Talking the talk?

Thursday 5 June 2025 | Geneva

If Day 1 was about the urgency of governance and information, Day 2 was about money — or rather, how little of it goes where it should. For the technical audience, we covered terms like efficiency, effectiveness and adequacy. 

From the high-level panels to the simulated role-play games, a shared message emerged: we know what to do, we just aren’t doing it. Why? By the end of the day, I left with more questions than answers — and maybe that’s the most honest thing to say😂

Is today’s disaster the outcome of yesterday’s development model? Are we investing in resilience — or just externalizing risk, again and again? what is the economic value of resilience? these are some of the questions I left with (Keep an eye out for some publications on these)

HLD3: What Will It Take to Scale DRR Financing?

This panel featured insights from government leaders, the ADB, private insurers, and UN-linked risk modellers. We heard big numbers: $2.3 trillion annually in disaster-related costs when cascading and ecosystem impacts are factored in. We also heard what many already know: “Resilience needs to move from being a buzzword to having a face.”

The ADB highlighted its shift from dialogue to action, with efforts to:

From the insurance world, a clear takeaway emerged: insurance isn’t just about post-disaster recovery — it can also raise pre-disaster risk awareness. But integrating it into national systems remains uneven.

Key provocation: Can we truly talk about DRR financing without first addressing the development pathways that created this risk in the first place?

Role-Playing Game: Who Sits at the DRR Table?

This simulation was thought-provoking, if slightly artificial. But it raised an essential point:

“So much is public in theory, but privatized in practice.”

Accountability is meaningless if mandates are vague and incentives misaligned.

TS3-1: Integrating DRR into the Global Financial System

This session tackled the hard stuff: regulation, financial architecture, incentive design.

“The greatest risk is failing to act. It is not the floods or the droughts.”

Highlights included:

We also learned about tools like:

Key question: Can DRR financing be truly integrated into financial systems if we don’t reform the incentives driving private risk-taking?

Learning Summary – What I Took Away

What I learned:

For readers of this site, key takeaways:

We started the day asking what it would take to scale DRR financing. We ended it with harder questions: Whose development is being protected? Who bears the burden of inaction? And why are we still not doing enough, even when we know the cost? With the Financing for Development conference in Seville just weeks away, these are timely questions to keep in mind, and i hope more (questions) and answers will come for the F4D!

“Let’s start spending money where we can save it.” — Spanish delegate